🔗 Share this article

The number of guaranteed seats for Māori representatives on New Zealand councils will be cut by over 50%, following a controversial legislative amendment that required municipal councils to put the fate of hard-won Māori seats to a popular referendum.

Historical Context on Māori Wards

Indigenous electoral districts, which can include one or more councillors depending on local population numbers, were created in 2001 to give Indigenous voters the option to vote for a guaranteed Māori representative in municipal and provincial governments. Originally, councils were only able to establish a Māori ward by initially submitting it to a community referendum in their region. Local populations frequently devoted considerable time building community backing and pushing their councils to establish Indigenous representation.

Policy Changes and Government Actions

To address this concern, the former administration permitted local councils to set up a Māori ward without initially mandating them to subject it to a popular ballot.

But in 2024, the right-wing coalition government overturned the policy, saying local residents should decide whether to establish Indigenous representation.

Referendum Results

The coalition’s law change required local authorities that had established a electoral district under Labour’s rules to hold decisive public votes concurrently with the local body elections, which concluded on 11 October. Out of 42 local governments participating in the referendum, 17 voted to keep their seats, and 25 to disestablish theirs – revealing numerous areas opposed to reserved Indigenous seats.

The results represented “a crucial move in reinstating community self-determination.”

Critics nevertheless have criticised the new policy as “discriminatory” and “anti-Māori”. Since taking office, the current administration has implemented sweeping rollbacks to measures intended to enhance Māori health, wellbeing and representation. Officials has said it aims to terminate “ethnic-specific” approaches, and asserts it is committed to improving outcomes for Māori and all New Zealanders.

Urban-Rural Divide

Outcomes of the public votes were split down urban-rural lines – most urban centers required to vote backed Indigenous seats, while rural regions skewed heavily towards removing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Māori wards that had recently been established – they’re only just starting to find their footing.”

Electoral Participation and Criticism

This year’s local government elections recorded the lowest voter turnout in over three decades, with less than a third of eligible voters casting a vote, prompting demands for reform.

This approach had been “a farce”.

Comparative Treatment

Councils are able to establish different wards – including rural wards – without first requiring a community ballot. The disparate requirements applied to Indigenous representation suggested the government was singling out Indigenous inclusion.

“Ultimately, they were unsuccessful. Many communities have expressed strong opposition.”

This statement referred to the 17 areas that voted to retain their wards.