🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn connections viewing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of commenters applauding your advice on growing your business? Do recruiters reaching out to explore collaborations?

If not, the reason might be your gender.

The Test: Changing Profile Gender for Better Visibility

Dozens of female professionals participated in an organized professional network test this week following popular discussions indicated that changing their gender to "male" enhanced their network presence.

Other testers modified their profiles to include what they termed "bro-coded" terminology - inserting action-focused business buzzwords like "drive", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their exposure similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Concerns Raised

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether an inherent gender bias in the platform's system favors male users who employ online business jargon.

Similar to most major social media platforms, LinkedIn employs an algorithm to decide which posts appear to which members - promoting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

Through a company announcement, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but stated it does not consider "demographic information" when determining content distribution. Instead, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" influence how content are received.

Modifying profile gender on your profile does not influence how your content appears in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who changed her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her profile name to "Simon E", described remarkable results.

"The numbers I'm seeing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a thirteen-fold jump in impressions," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, began experimenting after noticing her audience decrease significantly.

The Method

• First, she modified her gender to "male"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rephrase her profile using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Lastly, she repurposed old posts with comparable "assertive" language

The result was immediate: a 415% increase in visibility within one week.

The Downside

Despite the success, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the method.

"Before, my posts were softer - brief and insightful, but also friendly and human," she explained. "Now, the bro-coded version was assertive and confident - like a white male being overly confident."

She discontinued the test after one week, stating "Every day I continued, and outcomes got better, I became angrier."

Varying Outcomes

Some testers encountered positive results. One writer who modified both her profile gender to "male" and her race to "white" reported a reduction in reach and interaction.

"We understand there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it functions in specific cases or the reasons behind it," she commented.

Broader Implications

These tests coincide with continuing conversations about LinkedIn's unique role as both a business platform and community site.

Recent changes in recent months have reportedly caused female creators experiencing significantly reduced exposure, resulting in informal experiments where identical content by men and women received vastly different reach.

Technical Explanation

Per LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to categorize and distribute posts based on various elements, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.

The company states it regularly evaluates its systems, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson proposed that current reductions in some users' reach might originate from higher volume due to more content on the platform.

Changing Landscape

As one participant noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's turning into increasingly competitive and unpredictable."